AMD Ryzen vs FX – Review and Buying Guide

AMD Ryzen vs FX

I think you must have heard about Intel vs AMD, but you might not know about AMD Ryzen vs FX. The purpose of this post is mainly for those who are unfamiliar with AMD‘s newest processors and their names. We will discuss the AMD processor series in this brief post, as well as the benefits of buying one over the other. Our goal with this article is to tell you what processor to buy so that you can make a well-informed and wise decision.

FX Series Processors

Let’s start with AMD FX processors. This generation of AMD processors called “AMD FX” is introduced in 2011. AMD promoted its FX series processors heavily in order to compete with Intel’s Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge processors. FX was the first processor series to support true 8-core processors, as opposed to Intel’s dual-core product line which tended to have hyperthreading to 4 logical cores.

Each CPU in this series could be overclocked while still being fairly affordable, making them appealing to PC enthusiasts. Except for the more expensive ones, most processors were locked at their base clock speeds. FX was criticized by reviewers soon after it launched. The Intel FX lineup performed significantly slower than Sandy Bridge due to the common resources between multiple cores. In many single-threaded applications. Phenom II microprocessors were worse than the former generation.

Despite not being as low as the Phenom II generation, this series had a higher power consumption than what Intel was offering at the time. After the piledriver architecture was introduced in 2012, the clock speeds of processors increased across the board with similar power consumption levels.

During that time, the Ivy Bridge architecture was available, delivering greater efficiency in terms of power usage and overall performance compared to the Sandy Bridge architecture. AMD accounted for only 20% of consumer CPU sales in 2016. Over the life of the FX chipset, Intel maintained its lead in the market. There is only the 6-core FX-6300 processor on that list, which is currently available for a very low price. Also, another good choice is an 8-core chip that is popular for its performance and price.

With its affordable price and wide range of features, the FX-8320 is one of the most popular 8-core CPUs currently available. Because of this, it is currently our choice for the best AMD processor available. It offers good performance at a reasonable price. You can also buy good FX processors at a reasonable price from below.

Our Recommendations for The Best AMD FX Series Processors

Low Budget FX Processor

AMD FX-4300 Processor

Low Budget FX Processor


CPU Cores:4 | Max Boost Clock: Up to 4.0 GHz | Total L3 Cache: 4 MB | Socket: AM3+ | Max Temps: 80c |


Faster all-core base performance

Faster all-core boost performance



AMD fx 4300 is an affordable CPU when it comes to the price-performance ratio. You can see a notable improvement over the previous generation Zambezi CPU, AMD fx 4100. It is a 32 nm quad-core CPU, manufactured under the term “Vishera”, with a TDP of 95 watts, and developed for the motherboard’s AM3+ socket, operating at 3.8 GHz with a turbo clock of 4.0 GHz.

I think the most obvious difference between the FX-6350 and the FX-7350 is the lack of two cores on the former while the latter has a slightly lower clock speed on the latter. On the basis of price alone, the counterpart to the FX-4300 would be the Intel Pentium G4400. Choosing the FX-4300 as a low-cost alternative to the FX-6350 was our objective, as we compared its performance against the FX-6350, as well as against the FX-8350 (to compare all three families). 

High Budget FX Processor

FX-8120 Processor

High Budget FX Processor


CPU Cores: 8 | Max Boost Clock:Up to 4.0 GHz | Total L3 Cache: 8 MB | Socket: AM3+ | Max Temps: 61c |


Multithreaded applications perform well

Good performance


Single-core performance is not good

AMD launched the FX-8120 in October 2011. It was an 8-core desktop processor. This processor is part of the FX lineup, using the Zambezi architecture with Socket AM3+. The FX-8120 has 8MB of L3 cache and runs at 3.1 GHz by default, but can boost up to 4 GHz if needed.

AMD manufactures the FX-8120 with 1,200 million transistors on a 32 nm production node. Due to the unlocked multiplier on FX-8120, you may easily adjust the overclocking frequency, which simplifies overclocking greatly. With a TDP of 125 W, the FX-8120 consumes a lot of power, so good cooling is definitely needed. 

Average Budget FX Processor

AMD FX-6300

Average Budget FX Processor


CPU Cores: 6 | Max Boost Clock: Up to 3.8 GHz | Total L3 Cache: 8MB | Socket: AM3+ | Max Temps: 70c |


The base clock speed is excellent

Excellent all-core boost speeds

The package includes a CPU Cooler,


Comparative analysis of multi-tasking performance.

The inefficient thermal manufacturing process

AMD FX-6300 is a desktop processor with six cores, released in October 2012. It uses the Vishera architecture with the Socket AM3+ and is part of the FX lineup. The FX-6300 operates at 3.5 GHz by default but can boost up to 4.1 GHz depending on workload. It has 8MB of L3 cache. In AMD’s FX-6300, 1,200 million transistors are used in a 32-nanometer production node. On the FX-6300, you may freely adjust the multiplier, which simplifies overclocking because you are able to adjust any overclocking frequency.

The AMD FX-6300, released in 2012, sets a record for overclocking at 8 GHz, breaking the previous record set by other AMD products. According to the serial overclocker Yosarianilives, he has succeeded in overclocking an AMD FX-6300 processor to a speed of 8 GHz. 

The use of AMD’s six-core FX-6300, released in 2012, is the first occasion anyone has ever achieved such a high frequency with it. It has taken nine long years for anyone to achieve this record. AMD’s FX series processors are back in the world of overclocking in 2021 after a long hiatus. But they will not be breaking world records with their Ryzen processors but with AMD’s FX processors.

The AMD Ryzen Processors

The AMD Ryzen is a new architecture developed by AMD in February 2017. In the PC world, AMD has introduced a new line of processors specifically designed to battle Intel core i5 and i7 chips. The AMD Ryzen processors are extremely powerful and best suited for gaming PCs.

AMD uses the AM4 socket to house their Ryzen processors, which can also be overclocked by the user. With the release of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper series in August 2017, AMD entered the enthusiast workstation market. As well as supporting more memory channels than AMD’s previous Threadripper processor, AMD Ryzen Threadripper also supports additional PCI Express lanes.

Ryzen 7 is a good processor. The number of processor cores plays a role, but the GPU plays a much bigger role in gaming. AMD Ryzen 7 is a great processor choice for rendering and multithreaded applications in general, and it can also be used to play games.

Below are some editors’ pick Ryzen processors that you can purchase.

Our Recommendations for The Best AMD Ryzen Series Processors

High Budget Gaming Ryzen Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

High Budget Gaming Ryzen Processor


CPU Cores: 12 | Max Boost Clock: Up to 4.8 GHz | Total L3 Cache: 64 MB | Socket: AM4 | Max Temps:90c |


Unlocked multiplier

PCIe 4.0 support

Impressive gaming performance



AMD has priced the Ryzen 9 5900X processor at $549, which is about the same price as the current Core i9-10900K street price (it originally launched at around $500). Despite several refinements to the microarchitecture, Ryzen 9 5900X’s CPU cores are built on the same 7 nm silicon fabrication process as the Ryzen 3000 “Zen 2” processor.

One of Zen 3’s biggest changes is that the company has gotten rid of the 4-core CCX and has consolidated all the cores of the CPU chipset into one 8-core CCX. Even within the CPU core, AMD has worked to reduce latencies, improve branch prediction, optimize the execution engine, fatten the front-end and load/store unit, and deploy faster caches, which has a direct effect on IPC.

Gaming performance is largely determined by IPC, and AMD’s 19% claimed IPC gain over “Zen 2” should mean the company has taken the gaming title since “Zen 2” wasn’t too far behind “Comet Lake” anyway.

Average Budget Gaming Ryzen Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

Average Budget Gaming Ryzen Processor


CPU Cores: 6 | Max Boost Clock: Up to 4.4 GHz | Total L3 Cache: 32 MB | Socket: AM4 | Max Temps: 95c |


Solid performance across multiple cores 

Great performance

Core processors Bundled cooler


Ryzen 5 3600 a better value bet

In July 2019, AMD released the Ryzen 5 3600X desktop processor with 6 cores. Ryzen 5 uses the Zen 2 (Matisse) architecture, which is compatible with Socket AM4. AMD Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT) effectively doubles the thread count to 12 through SMT. The Ryzen 5 3600X is equipped with 32MB of L3 cache and operates at 3.8 GHz by default, but can reach 4.4 GHz depending on the workload.

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X is built using a 7 nm process and 3,800 million transistors. TSMC is the foundry that fabricates the silicon die of the chip, not AMD. On Ryzen 5 3600X, the unlocked multiplier can be freely adjusted, which simplifies overclocking greatly since you can easily dial in any overclocking frequency.

Low Budget Gaming Ryzen Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 1400

Low Budget Gaming Ryzen Processor


CPU Cores: 6 | Max Boost Clock: up to 3.4 GHz | Total L3 Cache: 8 MB | Socket: AM4 | Max Temps: 95c |


Performing at a high level of competitiveness

Results in more cores reaching the mainstream


It does not come with a RGB cooler

AMD Ryzen 5 1400 is a desktop processor with four cores, launched in April 2017. Ryzen 5 uses the Zen architecture with Socket AM4 and is part of the Ryzen 5 lineup. With AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT), there are now eight threads, effectively doubling the core count. AMD’s Ryzen 5 1400 features 8MB of L3 cache and operates at 3.2 GHz by default, but can boost up to 3.4 GHz depending on the workload.

The AMD manufactures the Ryzen 5 1400 on a 14 nm production node with 4,800 million transistors. The silicon dies of the chip is fabricated by GlobalFoundries, not AMD. Ryzen 5 1400 has an unlocked multiplier that can be freely adjusted, which simplifies overclocking greatly since any overclocking frequency can be easily dialed in.

Are AMD FX processors good? – AMD Ryzen vs FX Battle

Many people want to buy AMD FX processors for gaming purposes, while others want to buy Fx Processors for normal work. AMD FX APUs can give your computer fast speed, smooth performance, and good fps in gaming. The AMD FX processors consist of four modules (not cores) and eight threads, but each thread is weak. Therefore, the FX series did not perform well in running programs and games. That is why AMD FX processors have a bad reputation in the eyes of many users and AMD Ryzen vs FX battle.

Why was AMD FX so bad?

AMD had great expectations for its FX-series processors, but these processors did not meet the user’s requirements. Because of their low reputation, you can find these processors anywhere at a low price. The AMD FX chips cant perform as well as Intel processors, but Intel chips are more expensive and provide good performance. Because of that, Intel processors are usually preferred over AMD FX processors by many users.

Is Ryzen better than FX? – AMD Ryzen vs FX Comparison

In the battle of AMD Ryzen vs FX, a Ryzen processor is completely different from an FX processor series. Word “Different” is more appropriate than “better”. This is not an “update” to the series, it is a completely different processor. Even if you own an FX 8350, it will be useful for a long time. However, unless you can find it super cheap, I wouldn’t recommend grabbing one. If you plan to play any modern game, the FX 8350 can handle it. However, Ryzen is my choice due to its newer technology and better optimization for AAA gaming.

Well if you compare Ryzen 4 core processor to FX 8350. Compared to the FX-8350, Ryzen is not just faster: it is a lot faster, with each core almost two times as fast. I recommend getting the Ryzen.

What is AMD Bulldozer?

AMD Bulldozer is a microprocessor microarchitecture made by AMD for AMD FX and Opteron processors. Bulldozer is the codename of these microarchitectures. It was released in October 2012. Bulldozer’s predecessor is “K10” and its successor is “Piledriver“.

Why was AMD Bulldozer so bad?

The Bulldozer microarchitecture was designed to have a large number of weak cores because AMD anticipated future software being more multithreaded than it is currently. There were also many other problems such as extremely high latency, a slow cache, and high-temperature issues, but it was just a badly designed microarchitecture.

Which is better AMD FX or Ryzen? – AMD Ryzen vs FX

The AMD Ryzen processors are based on fresh and newer “Zen” microarchitecture. The AMD has returned to the high-end CPU market with a product that is challenging to compete with Intel processors. AMD Ryzen has more processing cores. The AMD Ryzen processors provide better multi-threaded performance compared to Intel’s Core chips. The Zen architecture provides 52% faster clock speeds without consuming additional power over the AMD Bulldozer core clock of the previous generation.

The AMD FX series was generally worse performing than its Intel competitors during that time. The FX series’ floating-point performance was relatively poor due to its single shared FPU per module and its high core count. AMD SKUs typically excelled at multithreaded applications. Its power consumption and maximum temperature, however, were often worse than its predecessors.

Now you should know which one is better after reading this. The Ryzen processors are better than FX series processors. Ryzen processors have faster clocks and faster memory, and it has everything a user needs. Ryzen is a much newer generation of processors, whereas FX is much older. That is why I am considering Ryzen over FX processors.

Reasons to Buy AMD FX Processor:

An AMD FX Processor is the best choice if you have a low budget and want your games to run smoothly at normal settings and average frame rates. The processor works well for editing and rendering videos as well. The processor runs at a much higher temperature than the average Intel processor. You are good to go if you want to use this processor for average gaming and video editing tasks. Do not forget to get a good CPU cooler for AMD FX processors!

Reasons to Buy AMD Ryzen Processor:

AMD Ryzen is much better than the FX series. Ryzen is based on AMD’s “Zen” microarchitecture, which is newer and faster. If you’re looking for a CPU with the best performance, features, value, and budget, AMD Ryzen is the best choice. In many ways, Ryzen beats Intel in tests done by many professionals. This processor provides great performance in games, editing, and rendering. Even the lowest tier processor from Ryzen called AMD Ryzen 1400 provides a lot better performance than many Intel processors.


For me, both processors are good at what they do. AMD FX is best for those who want average gaming performance with moderate settings and for editing, and rendering purposes at an affordable price. AMD Ryzen has been designed for those users who have a high budget and who want excellent performance in games at high settings and high FPS. However, if you are looking for more performance, in the battle of AMD Ryzen vs FX I suggest you go with the AMD Ryzen series because it is newer and faster than AMD’s previous generations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ryzen better than FX?

The Ryzen processor isn’t just better than the FX. It’s significantly faster, with each core being almost twice as fast as an FX core.

Is AMD FX bad?

Over its lifespan, the AMD FX line of processors generally performed worse than its Intel rivals. Due to a single shared FPU per module, floating-point performance was relatively poor. AMD SKUs typically excelled in applications that benefited from more threads.  

Why did AMD FX fail?

FX processors were overpriced and overhyped, which meant that they accomplished tasks in the same way Intel processors had been doing for three years or more, but they cost twice as much and used twice as much power.

Asad Malik
My name is Asad Malik, and I have done my intermediate in Computer Science, and I really enjoy finding out about the newest tech products, buying them, and writing reviews on them.